The listing of the biggest project in recent years has finally happened. We all dreamed of a big score, so we engaged in numerous activities online – all posts under the hashtag #STARKNET. People’s emotions are all over the place, from severe disappointment about being duped to euphoria (some cashed out tens of thousands of dollars).
We waited a long time for wallet updates and token transfers. In the end, we cashed out at a loss. Luckily, it went for $5.
Will we hold? — Possibly, but we’ve decided to sell everything for now since we’re expecting a drop in the token’s value and might buy more later. We think the market maker might want to pump the price before unlocking. Also, we’re now looking for projects to invest in for farming and earning extra money – maximizing profit. But for now, we’ll spread our investment across various tokens and tier 1.5 projects.
Conclusions about Starknet: — Many got shaved – that’s true, but we’re personally satisfied because our expenses paid off multiple times, and many “hamsters” got trimmed, allowing Retro to continue.
— Regarding the balance in $ETH, we really hope this doesn’t happen again. But ask yourself honestly — are you ready to step on the same rake again? It seems to us that strong wallets should have a balance in Ether, as even the much-praised Arbitrum took 1 point if there was no balance. This take was pushed by a small number of influencers a year ago, so this move isn’t new.
— Quality or quantity? The question is still relevant today. The best option is to use a pyramidal strategy. Strong wallets – medium wallets – weak wallets. Focusing only on weak ones makes no sense, focusing only on medium ones makes no sense, but focusing only on quality makes sense, because then we’ll 99% get the drop.